Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Multiprecision review results
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-05 08:15:01
Thank you very much for managing the review, Jeff.
> John Maddock and Christopher Kormanyos' Multiprecision
> library is ACCEPTED for inclusion into Boost,
> with 8 YES votes, 1 NO vote, and 1 CONDITIONAL vote.
cpp_dec_float should round rather than truncate on narrowing conversions.
Review manager hat off: I wonder if a radix-2 implementation of an
arbitrary precision float should ultimately be prioritized and recommended
over the present radix-10 implementation?
Yes. In my opinion, a radix-2 implementation of the boost-licensed
floating-point back-end with enhanced efficiency, greater maximum
digit count and sensible rounding policies is very high on my to-do list.
cpp_dec_float is my main contribution to Boost.Multiprecision,
and I am primarily responsible for this.
I would, however, like to find one or more developers who have
knowledge in this domain to assist with a potential cpp_bin_float.
It's just too much work for one person and, quite frankly, there are
a few trouble spots that I don't know how to deal with yet.
Please also note that I can not begin working on cpp_bin_float
until autumn or winter at the earliest.
Thanks again to everyone who contributed to the review.
Best regards, Chris.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk