Subject: [boost] [type_erasure][docs]uniform term for underlying
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-14 09:38:40
uses 3 terms:
to designate, essentially, the same thing, the actual type stored in the
The docs would be clearer if a uniform term were used, with possibly
a link to some glossary where the term was defined.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk