Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [contract] a possible future extension
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-28 03:27:48

Hi Lorenzo,
This is definitely outside the scope of the review, but I was wondering
whether it would be feasible for the macros in Boost.Contract to handle
base class aliases, as described in this proposal:
The positive "side effect" of your framework is that it has the potential
to add various missing language features. I am wondering if these aliases
proposed in N2881 are worth the effort.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at