[boost] [contract] a possible future extension

Subject: [boost] [contract] a possible future extension
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-28 03:27:48

Hi Lorenzo,
This is definitely outside the scope of the review, but I was wondering
whether it would be feasible for the macros in Boost.Contract to handle
base class aliases, as described in this proposal:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2881.html
The  positive "side effect" of your framework is that it has the potential
to add various missing language features. I am wondering if these aliases
proposed in N2881 are worth the effort.

Regards,
&rzej