Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Proposed BOOST_NOEXCEPT_NOTHROW macro
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-29 10:40:27
On 2012-08-29 15:31, Beman Dawes wrote:
> My thinking was that there was some small advantage to beginning each
> of the noexcept macros with BOOST_NOEXCEPT.
> I worry that BOOST_THROWS_NOTHING would be misconstrued as a
> replacement for "Throws: Nothing" specifications, and that isn't the
> case. BOOST_NEVER_THROWS might be a bit better. But I think I still
> prefer BOOST_NOEXCEPT_OR_NOTHROW. Or the original suggested
BOOST_NOEXCEPT_AND_NOTHROW ? OR sounds like a choice.
Just my 2ct.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk