Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] N3276 decltype support on VC++ 11
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-01 00:25:55

Eric Niebler wrote:
> I'm tempted to simply merge the changes, the odd breakage here and there
> be damned. We stand a bigger risk with such a fundamental piece of
> infrastructure differing between trunk and release, IMO. Thoughts?

I couldn't expect proper fixes for decltype-based result_of
compatibility will take place soon.

So, if we push the result_of change into the release branch,
shouldn't we replace `result_of` with `tr1_result_of` for
the breaking components ?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at