Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] N3276 decltype support on VC++ 11
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-01 00:25:55
Eric Niebler wrote:
> I'm tempted to simply merge the changes, the odd breakage here and there
> be damned. We stand a bigger risk with such a fundamental piece of
> infrastructure differing between trunk and release, IMO. Thoughts?
I couldn't expect proper fixes for decltype-based result_of
compatibility will take place soon.
So, if we push the result_of change into the release branch,
shouldn't we replace `result_of` with `tr1_result_of` for
the breaking components ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk