Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of] now uses decltype on release branch
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-06 15:37:47
On 9/4/2012 8:01 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> The question is: should we allow SFINAE for result_of. I think now
> that we should.
I made a case for this on the committee reflectors. They generally
seem to like the idea. In short: you were right, Joel. I'm now
generally in favor of changing result_of. Boost result_of can be
existing practice for (hopefully) a future change in the standard.
Daniel, is this something you're also interested in? I can see about a
Joel, since this is essentially your idea, would you be interested in
co-authoring a paper for the committee? I don't anticipate it would
have to be very long or elaborate.
Also, apologies for my defensiveness earlier.
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk