Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of] now uses decltype on release branch
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-06 15:37:47

On 9/4/2012 8:01 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> The question is: should we allow SFINAE for result_of. I think now
> that we should.

I made a case for this on the committee reflectors. They generally
seem to like the idea. In short: you were right, Joel. I'm now
generally in favor of changing result_of. Boost result_of can be
existing practice for (hopefully) a future change in the standard.
Daniel, is this something you're also interested in? I can see about a

Joel, since this is essentially your idea, would you be interested in
co-authoring a paper for the committee? I don't anticipate it would
have to be very long or elaborate.

Also, apologies for my defensiveness earlier.

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at