Re: [boost] [Review.Coroutine] More comments, questions and suggestions

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review.Coroutine] More comments, questions and suggestions
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-11 03:14:03

On Tuesday 11 September 2012 09:08:03 Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> 
> It is possible to implement it but I've concerns because the coroutine-fn
> has another signature/return type as the signature given to coroutine as
> template argument. It might confuse users.
> 
> typedef coroutine< int( int) > coro_t;
> 
> void fn( coro_t::self_t&, int)
> {...}

I don't follow the thread closely, but you could provide a placeholder type to 
indicate the self_t argument in the signature. Then

typedef coroutine< int(self, int) > coro_t;

or

typedef coroutine< int(int, self) > coro_t;

or

typedef coroutine< int(int) > coro_t;

are all possible and self-explaining.