Re: [boost] [nowide] Library looks for a review manager

Subject: Re: [boost] [nowide] Library looks for a review manager
From: Jookia (166291_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-15 06:18:56

On 15/09/12 19:32, Artyom Beilis wrote:
> The only way to fully replace these is to provide an alternative standard
> C++ library like STLPort or libc++, but actually C library replacement
> may be required as std::fopen is just an alias to libc fopen.

Ah. I suppose drop-in replacements would end up with buggy code due to 
developers expecting implementation details or things to work exactly 
the same anyway.