Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Subject: Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-18 15:14:51

Peter Sommerlad <peter.sommerlad <at> hsr.ch> writes:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> just to give my 0.02CHF.
> 
> I was trying to teach unit testing in C++ years ago and found Boost.Test
> unteachable then and Google-Test to be too much 90s style C++. 
> Therefore, I created a modern library that was simple and easy to teach, but

I appreciate that you obviously prefer your own library, but before we start
attaching labels, what exactly you mean by Boost.Test being unteachable.

Gennadiy