Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Subject: Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-19 13:13:28

Daniel James wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2012 11:35 PM, "Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> There's no need to wait for "modularized Boost" to start doing this.
>> This could be done now with relatively modest (though of course
>> tricky) adjustments in the test script.
>
> I think this is a case of "patches welcome".

lol - no good deed goes unpunished.

So, you're agreeing with my suggestion?  That would make 4 onboard.

So far,

Robert Ramey