Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Subject: Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?
From: Gennadiy Rozenal (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-05 01:49:47

Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:

> 
> 
> on Tue Sep 18 2012, Peter Sommerlad <peter.sommerlad-AT-hsr.ch> wrote:
> 
> > I was trying to teach unit testing in C++ years ago and found 
> > Boost.Test unteachable
> 
> I should point out that Peter and I had no communication about
> Boost.Test before this conversation, and we reached the same
> conclusion.  

As it stands neither you nor Peter presented any specific problems 
about teach-ability or learn-ability, but just hide behind long pretty 
words. In fact number of people even in this thread expressed different 
opinion and in my experience Boost.Test have pretty low entry  
threshold. There were complains about some advanced features, but 
very few people had troubles learning basic interfaces.

Gennadiy