Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Subject: Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-05 15:13:39

on Fri Oct 05 2012, Gennadiy Rozenal <rogeeff-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

>> Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:
>> on Sat Sep 29 2012, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> >> Google Mock itself is unbelievably useful.
>> > Frankly, I can't see what the fuss is all about. 
>> 
>> The fuss is about teachability and learnability.
>
> I understand you have point to make, but I was talking about gmock. 
> Did you? (talk about it)

Ah, no... except to note that Sohail was able to learn to use it in no
time flat.  Thanks for clarifying.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing                  Software Development        Training
http://www.boostpro.com             Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers  C++  Boost