Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.52.0] Beta1 release available
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-10 07:06:28

Le 10/10/12 10:24, Daniel James a écrit :
> On 10 October 2012 00:06, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Okay.
> I've only checked in the changes that are already in the beta, I'll
> deal with the others later, I need to somehow make it clear that
> they're not in the actual beta.
>>> Btw. IMO you shouldn't require the user to define
>>> macros just to be able to compile the library, is u32string support
>>> really that important?
>> Well, support for u16string and u32 string has been delivered long time ago,
>> so removing them seems not an alternative, or is it?
> Then I'd put some sort of special case for the problematic standard
> library myself, but if you feel that's not worth it, then it's your
> decision.
Oh, I see. Instead of using the future BOOST_NO_CXX11_U16STRING I can
use my own macro that is defined when compiling with the already
identified library. I will made the update as soon as possible hopping
it could go to the release.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at