Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Integration with Chrono and DateTime
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-13 14:21:09

on Fri Oct 12 2012, "Vicente J. Botet Escriba" <> wrote:

>>> Any addition code has its influence on how the library could evolve. I
>> really would prefer to remove these interfaces for Boost 1.56. I think that
>> 1 year and a half is enough time to move to the new interface.
>> Then I think library decoupling is the right way even more.
> You are surely right, but this is not a priority for me. What others think?

In general I'm all for decoupling, but in the case of Chrono I wonder if
it's worth the trouble, since it is, after all, standard in C++11.
Also, I bet C++03 implementations are going to start shipping with
approximations for all the C++11 libraries, if they haven't already.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing                  Software Development        Training             Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers  C++  Boost

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at