Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-26 01:04:08


Le 26/10/12 05:51, Gennadiy Rozenal a écrit :
> David Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:
>
>> BOOST_TEST?
> Ok. How about this:
>
> BOOST_TEST - check level tool
> BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE - require level tool
> BOOST_TEST_WARN - warning level tool

Hi,

I don't think that there should be conflicts but I wanted just to report
that boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp defines

#define BOOST_TEST(expr) ((expr)? (void)0:
::boost::detail::test_failed_impl(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__,
BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION))
#define BOOST_ERROR(msg) ::boost::detail::error_impl(msg, __FILE__,
__LINE__, BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION)
#define BOOST_TEST_EQ(expr1,expr2) (
::boost::detail::test_eq_impl(#expr1, #expr2, __FILE__, __LINE__,
BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION, expr1, expr2) )
#define BOOST_TEST_NE(expr1,expr2) (
::boost::detail::test_ne_impl(#expr1, #expr2, __FILE__, __LINE__,
BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION, expr1, expr2) )

> Does anyone have any other comments about new features? Do they look
> release ready?
>
>
I could not say nothing until the documentation is ready for review :(

Please add an history with a list of the new features.

Best,
Vicente


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk