Subject: Re: [boost] make_shared_array
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-02 10:12:40
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
>> Wouldn't mind a variant of shared_array that knows it's size either.
> There is shared_range, an iterator_range subclass with shared
> ownership semantics, that we put together awhile ago:
> Any reason this doesn't meet your needs for a
> shared_array-that-knows-its-size? I've been happily using it for some
But it's not in Boost. Any plans to propose it?
Almost forgot about it, was weird seeing my name there. ;)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk