Subject: Re: [boost] make_shared_array
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-02 10:35:56
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> There is shared_range, an iterator_range subclass with shared
>>> ownership semantics, that we put together awhile ago:
>> But it's not in Boost. Any plans to propose it?
> Think it's worth proposing as a Boost.Range utility class?
I'd propose it as shared_array2. :p
I think the functionality is more important than the name though and
I'd definitely like to see functionality like that in Boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk