Subject: [boost] shared_ptr<X>
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-05 08:37:40
Now that we (are going to) have shared_ptr<X>, what should
>From user point of view, it seems obvious that this is as good a pointer to
an array as shared_ptr<X> is, so it should behave similarly, having op
and an element_type of X.
>From a generic point of view, this could potentially break code that assumes
that shared_ptr<T>::get() always returns a T*, even when T is X. But how
common is such a scenario?
On the other hand, it will actually _fix_ generic code of the form
shared_ptr<T> p( new T );
when T is X.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk