Subject: Re: [boost] C++ announcements coming tomorrow
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-05 15:08:51
On 11/05/2012 01:57 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Thank you Stephan for digging it out. But I still don't agree with
>> your conclusions and consider it a serious bug.
> You code just seems broken to me, sorry. It's absolutely clear that the
> intent of the standard as currently written is for init to be called
> exactly once, immediately after default construction.
The requirement that init must be called
before destruction doesn't make any sense
if this weren't the intent.