Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?
From: TONGARI (tongari95_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-06 10:14:55

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost 1.52.0 released!"
Previous message: Rhys Ulerich: "Re: [boost] [test] BOOST_TEST - universal testing tool"
In reply to: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?"
Reply: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?"

2012/11/6 Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]>

> Wouldn't this fit in Boost.TypeTraits, along side the other type traits
> that introspect operators?
>

TypeTraits is also in my consideration, so I'm not against it.
So would you suggest opening up a new Functional category in that?

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost 1.52.0 released!"
Previous message: Rhys Ulerich: "Re: [boost] [test] BOOST_TEST - universal testing tool"
In reply to: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?"
Reply: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [functional] Interested in can_be_called<F, Sig> metafunction?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk