Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Process 0.5: Another update/potential candidate for an official library
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-14 05:17:17
On 2012-11-14 11:00, Rob Stewart wrote:
>> Uniformity is better.
> Why must child be copyable? Just because the underlying implementation permits it doesn't mean that you must permit it in your abstraction.
I'd even say uniformity is a requirement for the abstraction (unless
where it is impossible to achieve)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk