Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Macro for null pointer
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-16 07:55:37
2012/11/16 Vicente Botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:
> Why a library will need a type nullptr_t while there is only a constant in
> C++11? Please coul you elaborate?
According to draft of C++11 (I have no final version):
Pointer literals [lex.nullptr]
The pointer literal is the keyword `nullptr`. It is a prvalue of type
`std::nullptr_t`. [ Note: `std::nullptr_t`
is a distinct type that is neither a pointer type nor a pointer to
member type; rather, a prvalue of this type is
a null pointer constant and can be converted to a null pointer value
or null member pointer value.
-- Best regards, Antony Polukhin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk