Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] Updated serialization performance tests
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-16 14:34:48


Shalom

I've updated this page --
http://webEbenezer.net/comparison.html

with results from Boost 1.52.

A few notes about the testing:

I decided to use -O2 on the Linux/g++ tests. In previous
tests I used -O3.

I hadn't updated the Windows test results since the
Boost 1.48 time-frame. Around Boost 1.51 I had to
start building the serialization library in Boost
with runtime-link=static in order to get the Windows
tests to build. I haven't understood why that became
necessary, but the results for the serialization library
in Boost seem to have been adversely affected by this.
On Windows, I now report that tests built with the
serialization library in Boost are over 1.8 times slower
than parallel Ebenezer tests. Previously I reported the
tests built with the serialization library in Boost were
between 1.7 and 1.8 times slower than the Ebenezer tests.

--
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises -- making programming fun again.
http://webEbenezer.net

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk