Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of] fails with clan (C++11)
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-27 17:44:23
Peter Dimov wrote:
> The test looks broken. A function that takes X& can't be called
> with zero arguments.
This is the right answer; the test is wrong.
TR1-style result_of allows some of the **uncallable signatures**,
but such a usage is wrong and shouldn't be used.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk