Subject: Re: [boost] [compond_file_binary] Gauging interest in a possible library submission.
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-02 11:37:53
On December 2, 2012 8:01:12 PM Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Andrey Semashev
> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Does it provide any benefits compared to mounting a loop device and
> > working with it through traditional file system interfaces? It seems
> > odd to have a library duplicating file system operations.
> Is it? We don't use loop devices to read/write tar/zip files, do we?
On OS X you do mount packages. You also typically mount various image
files. Library-level access to conventional archive files is a legacy
from older systems (read Windows and DOS) that did not support flexible
> Can you even mount loop devices as unprivileged user?
Ok, you have a point about unprivileged mounting.
> Does Windows even have loop devices?
According to Wikipedia, it does now. But then again, Windows is not the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk