Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Macro for null pointer
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-05 15:20:26
On December 5, 2012 10:15:23 PM "Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr."
> I think the argument is that it's inconvenient when things do break. Much
> more inconvenient (and potentially less obvious to diagnose) than the
> inconvenience associated with requiring the user to explicitly bring the
> nullptr identifier into their desired use scope each time (which, IMHO, is
> not so bad).
I guess that's where our views differ. I prefer normal usage to be as
straightforward as possible. OTOH, it is acceptable for problem solving
to require some additional effort.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk