Re: [boost] Boost.Process 0.5: And another minor update

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Process 0.5: And another minor update
From: Joshua Boyce (raptorfactor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-09 13:53:41

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Boris Schaeling <boris_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I've uploaded a new version of Boost.Process 0.5 to <
> http://www.highscore.de/**boost/process0.5/
>

> >:
>
> - First command line argument passed to set_args is used as a path to the
> executable to start
> - No escaping of command line arguments anymore with set_args (see <
> http://article.gmane.org/**gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/**236137
>
> >)
> - Updated documentation
>
> Boris
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/**
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost<http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
>

Hi Boris,

Thanks for your continued work on this library.

I'm a little concerned by one of the changes you mentioned however,
specifically this one:

> No escaping of command line arguments anymore with set_args
>

I'm concerned because under Windows at least, the way that command line
arguments are escaped is quite important (and also difficult to get right).
Does your library correctly handle all the example cases given in the
article below?
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/twistylittlepassagesallalike/archive/2011/04/23/everyone-quotes-arguments-the-wrong-way.aspx

Thanks.