Subject: Re: [boost] static_vector using aligned_storage
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-12 19:30:42
On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Nevin Liber <nevin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Another possible solution is to fall back on an allocator if there isn't
>> enough room in the embedded storage. The signature would be something like
>> static_vector<T, N, A = std::allocator<T>>
>> And you could provide null_allocator_assert and null_allocator_throw as
>> options (or make one of those the default), as it is now the responsibility
>> of the allocator, not static_vector, to throw or not throw.
> That'd make it more like a hybrid_vector, but it's certainly a good idea.
> It's like a string with a small string optimization.
To me, that's a different container.
Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
-- Yu Suzuki
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk