Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Git] Documentation for Git and Modular Boost conversion
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-15 21:15:30

on Sun Dec 09 2012, Jookia <> wrote:

> On 09/12/12 01:04, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Modular Boost + Git has enough advantages that it is worth doing
>> regardless of what happens in the future. But the intent is to
>> continue work on further infrastructure improvements, for sure. The
>> specifics will evolve over time, but cmake interest continues to be
>> strong.
>> --Beman
> Is there a current discussion on moving to CMake?

Not much discussion, but...

> Or a status?

...Work in progress. You can experiment with the CMake port today
( Some tests still need to be
ported to CMake. To automatically fetch dependencies, you'll want
ryppl, which needs some work but is mostly functional.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing                  Software Development        Training             Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers  C++  Boost

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at