Subject: Re: [boost] static_vector using aligned_storage
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-17 18:29:14
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Hmm, it will be interesting to see how this works. Now that the
> weasel-wording is gone, the allocator's pointer type, etc., have
> specific meanings that might not be compatible with stack memory.
Could you please elaborate? Isn't it always a pointer to a type passed
to the allocator? How it may be treated differently for stack memory?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk