Subject: Re: [boost] [GIT] What happens to the Trac?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-17 21:32:55
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2012, at 2:24 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> on Mon Dec 17 2012, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard-AT-ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>>> On 17/12/12 23:03, Robert Ramey wrote:
>>>> Hmmmm - I've always thought Trac was great. It has some minor
>>>> annoyances - it slows down, but in general I think its just great
>>>> from a user(me) point of view.
>>> I was thinking it could be a good idea to let maintainers use the tool
>>> they're most comfortable with, but then lack of consistency might be
>>> disconcerting to external users.
>> Maybe. Regardless, I request that we take up the topic of bug tracking
>> systems after the transition to Git is complete.
Strong agreement. The release managers have to get a new Git-based
release system working, and are also deeply involved in getting
Git-based testing working. Not to mention the Git and Modular Boost
conversion itself. We need to get all that under our belt before
worrying about the svn trac.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk