Re: [boost] [atomic, x86] need another pair of eyes

Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic, x86] need another pair of eyes
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-19 11:58:03

Tim Blechmann wrote:

> to be more specific: of the test machines at sandia sometimes has test
> failures for boost.lockfree, which i cannot reproduce on my machine. the
> algorithm in question (the spsc_queue) only makes use of atomic reads
> and writes and only requires two memory barriers. the sandia machine is
> a 4 cpu, 8 core/cpu machine, while my machines are all single-cpu
> multi-core.

Which tests fail, by the way?