Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic, x86] need another pair of eyes
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-19 13:45:03
>>> Which tests fail, by the way?
>> > the stress test for the spsp_queue (spsc_queue_test_caching) ... one
>> > thread enqueueing a large number of elements, one thread dequeueing ...
> Yes but how? Which BOOST_REQUIRE fails, and what does it say?
some elements are lost ... the receiver reads less elements than the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk