Re: [boost] [atomic, x86] need another pair of eyes

Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic, x86] need another pair of eyes
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-19 13:45:03

>>> Which tests fail, by the way?
>> > 
>> > the stress test for the spsp_queue (spsc_queue_test_caching) ... one
>> > thread enqueueing a large number of elements, one thread dequeueing ...
> Yes but how? Which BOOST_REQUIRE fails, and what does it say?

some elements are lost ... the receiver reads less elements than the
sender enqueues:
BOOST_REQUIRE_EQUAL(received_nodes, nodes_per_thread);