Subject: Re: [boost] Patch for functional/hash
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-27 08:01:42
On Thursday, December 27, 2012 10:43:22 Daniel James wrote:
> On 27 December 2012 12:23, Thomas Heller <thom.heller_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Attached is a patch for functional/hash. The first chunk essentially gets
> > rid of some UB (the same technique was already applied for the remainder
> > so this looks like an oversight).
> Go ahead with that one.
> > I don't remember why exactly i added the second
> > chunk, it helps on some compilers though (I think gcc on Android).
> > Save to apply that patch?
> I would need a way to reproduce that, it has worked without problems
> for years on many versions of gcc.
Ok, I reverted it for now ... i'll report again whenever i see it popping up
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk