Re: [boost] [Range] Proposal: a sub-maintainer of Boost.Range

Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] Proposal: a sub-maintainer of Boost.Range
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-27 17:01:48

> Nathan Ridge wrote:
> >> Nathan Ridge wrote:
> >> > 1. At [1], I see a number of yellow "fail" boxes. The legend describes
> >> > this as "failure on a newly added test/compiler". Should I be worried
> >> > about these?
> >>
> >> At least, `type_erased` and `strided` have been failing for some time.
> >> IIRC, `strided` still has a bug, which can be found at
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/211955/focus=212004
> >> This bug might be the origin of the `strided` test failure.
> >
> > OK, thanks for letting me know. Since they have been failing for some
> > time, the failures are very likely unrelated to my bug fixes, so I
> > will go ahead and merge those.
>
> Yes, please :)
>
> After the merge, don't forget to add "fixes #5603 and #6110" to
> Boost 1.53 release notes!
> You can directly update (via subversion)
> website/public_html/live/feed/history/boost_1_53_0.qbk
> or you can post the release notes to "[1.53.0] Release Notes" thread.
> If you need an example of the release notes, please see
> https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/website/public_html/live/feed/history/boost_1_52_0.qbk

Done - thanks!

Regards,
Nate