Subject: Re: [boost] [string_ref] Feature requests
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-31 06:17:21
On 31/12/12 00:33, Marshall Clow wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2012, at 1:37 AM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 29/12/12 15:33, Daniel James wrote:
>>> Easy conversion to std::basic_string. There's a C++11 explicit string
>>> operator, but that isn't much good for portable code. Something like a
>>> 'string' or 'to_string' member would do the trick.
>> Why not make string_ref implicitly convertible when in C++03?
> Because it's an expensive conversion.
But making it implicitly convertible is the closest thing there is to
explicitly convertible in C++11.
It seems much cleaner than polluting the interface.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk