Subject: Re: [boost] Release managers: Boost.Thread breaking changes in 1.53
From: Krzysztof Czainski (1czajnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-31 06:37:22
2012/12/31 Tim Blechmann <tim_at_[hidden]>
> >> All depend on what do you intend by significant added value. From
> >> my POV the std thread was designed more carefully than Boost.Thread
> >> which was the implementation of one of the first proposals. The
> >> implementation was just frozen until the standard was fixed.
> > What is the point of changing boost::thread to behave like
> > std::thread?
> > The user can already choose to use std::thread behaviour - by using
> > std::thread.
> if you cannot use c++11 for some reasons, it is good to have
> source-compatible version in namespace boost ...
So how about Boost.Threads2 (like Signals2), while leaving Boost.Thread
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk