Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Most recent version
From: Alexander Arhipenko (arhipjan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-04 02:51:43

On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:27 PM, <Charles_J_Wilson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> We've been using the v2 log for over two years now.
>> We're currently working with r738. We're using it with wstrings (Windows),
>> time stamps, scopes, tags, file rollover, multi-thread and levels.
>> I highly recommend it.
>> If you have issues, you'll find Andrey both responsive and helpful.
> I've been using it for 6 months now and I can confirm that.
> Joel Lamotte


If you've started praising the library, here is my input ):
We are using boost.log in production environment starting from January 2009.
Recently upgraded to v1. The upgrade was quite painless.
This library really just works.
The only issue - it's not in the official release yet.
Hope this will change soon.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at