Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] error with nullptr_t
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-05 01:54:53

Michel Morin wrote:
> A few comments:
> * `defined(BOOST_CLANG)` would be safer than `defined(__clang__)`
> after resolving #7359 ( );
> it seems that Intel compiler can define `__clang__`.

We cannot say `defined(BOOST_CLANG)` would be safer in this case.
Please ignore my previous post, sorry.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at