Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] error with nullptr_t
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-05 01:54:53
Michel Morin wrote:
> A few comments:
> * `defined(BOOST_CLANG)` would be safer than `defined(__clang__)`
> after resolving #7359 ( https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7359 );
> it seems that Intel compiler can define `__clang__`.
We cannot say `defined(BOOST_CLANG)` would be safer in this case.
Please ignore my previous post, sorry.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk