Re: [boost] [1.53.0] Beta release candidates 2 now available for testing

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.53.0] Beta release candidates 2 now available for testing
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-05 23:28:28

On Jan 5, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Le 06/01/13 00:06, Marshall Clow a écrit :
>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Shouldn't BOOST_NO_CXX11_NUMERIC_LIMITS be defined as it doesn't provides a C++11 implementation, or should Boost.Chrono take in account the missing feature of libc++ individually?
>> I'm not sure what you are referring to with the word "it" in that sentence.
> I meant if Boost.Config shouldn't not define BOOST_NO_CXX11_NUMERIC_LIMITS when using the libc++ as doesn't provide a compliant c++11 implementation.

I think that's an over-reaction.

It's a bug. 
I'm not even sure that we should do anything about it; other than to note it and move on.

Clang 3.2 is at RC3 stage, so I'm pretty sure that this will be fixed before we ship Boost 1.53.0

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>

A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
        -- Yu Suzuki