Re: [boost] [variant] Basic rvalue and C++11 features support

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] Basic rvalue and C++11 features support
From: Alec Ross (alec_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-07 03:30:47

In message <50EA0D46.8080100_at_[hidden]>, Joel de Guzman 
<djowel_at_[hidden]> writes
>On 1/7/13 2:04 AM, Mathieu Champlon wrote:
>> On 06/01/2013 01:40, Joel de Guzman wrote:
>
>>>  template <typename T>
>>>  recursive_wrapper<T>::~recursive_wrapper()
>>>  {
>>>      if (p_)
>>>          boost::checked_delete(p_); ,
>>>  }
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Maybe I missed something but why would you test for p_ in the destructor ?
>> Isn't boost::checked_delete< T >( 0 ) valid ?
>
>You are right. The check is not needed.
>

But is there an expected performance benefit?

Regards,
-- 
Alec Ross