Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Can Boost.Thread use Boost.Atomic without falling on a compatibility issue?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-13 13:56:36
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> I would like to have an alternative for these platforms to avoid making
> Boost.Thread fail just because Boost.Atomic is not supported.
It won't fail, it will use the spinlock pool. When the spinlock cannot
be implemented with atomic ops (i.e. on a not supported platform) the
spinlock is implemented as boost::mutex from Boost.Thread.
I realize this would make the implementation suboptimal in case of
call_once. In that case we could fallback to a special implementation
that only uses pthread API. That would require to always lock the
mutex, even when the initialization is already done.
PS: It might be worthwhile to actually try to use the spinlocks from
pthread API in Boost.Atomic.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk