Re: [boost] Interest in breakable labeled scope emulation?

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in breakable labeled scope emulation?
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-15 05:00:45

On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:49 AM, TONGARI <tongari95_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> 2013/1/14 TONGARI <tongari95_at_[hidden]>
> 
>> 2013/1/14 Rob Stewart <robertstewart_at_[hidden]>
>> 
>>> While I understand the value of being able to exit such compound scopes cleanly, goto is a poor solution as it bypasses destructors, which makes this idea error prone.
>> 
>> No. At least for g++ & clang that I tested the stack is correctly unwound and the dtors are called.
> 
> You may want to see 6.7/3 "Declaration statement". It's standard guaranteed.

Quite right. I was thinking of sethmp/longjmp when I wrote that. Sorry for the noise.

___
Rob