Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior (Was: Basic rvalue and C++11 features seupport)
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-22 02:57:25

Next message: Olaf van der Spek: "Re: [boost] [container] static_vector: fixed capacity vector update"
Previous message: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] New algorithm in Boost.Algorithm: "gather" -- looking for comments"
In reply to: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior (Was: Basic rvalue and C++11 features seupport)"
Next in thread: Paul Smith: "Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior (Was: Basic rvalue and C++11 features seupport)"

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Joel de Guzman <djowel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]

> I *always* use variant< blank, ... > (or something similar). And that is
> precisely why I don't care much about the never-empty guarantee.
>

Okay, just checking :)

Next message: Olaf van der Spek: "Re: [boost] [container] static_vector: fixed capacity vector update"
Previous message: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] New algorithm in Boost.Algorithm: "gather" -- looking for comments"
In reply to: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior (Was: Basic rvalue and C++11 features seupport)"
Next in thread: Paul Smith: "Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior (Was: Basic rvalue and C++11 features seupport)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk