Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior (Was: Basic rvalue and C++11 features seupport)

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior (Was: Basic rvalue and C++11 features seupport)
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-25 14:33:22

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <
jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> IMHO, III is the only strictly correct solution, given variant's present
> never-empty guarantee (which the original author deemed pretty important,
> given the amount of documentation dedicated to it).
>
>

Unfortunately, I agree this is the only correct solution.  I think all the
other 'votes' are voting for "I wish move worked differently than what has
been laid out in the standard".

Tony