Subject: Re: [boost] [random] ranlux24_base(0) should be equal to ranlux24_base()
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-29 21:40:00
On Jan 29, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Stephan T. Lavavej <stl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> After fixing a bug in VC11's <random> (see ), I compared VC's fixed output to Boost 1.52.0's output and I believe I found a bug in Boost. Here's a self-contained test case:
Can you open a ticket on http://svn.boost.org ?
BTW, I get the same results as you do using clang/libc++
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk