Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] Please vote for behavior
From: Paul Smith (pl.smith.mail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-01 12:55:47

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> on Fri Feb 01 2013, Paul Smith <pl.smith.mail-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Larry Evans <cppljevans_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On 02/01/13 09:20, Paul Smith wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> There's the post:
>> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/variant-Please-vote-for-behavior-Was-Basic-rvalue-and-C-11-features-seupport-tp4641587p4642085.html
>>
>> And there's the quote:
>>
>>>>>> I don't want to read into what Dave said too much, because he's here
>>>>>> and he can clarify it. But I believe what he said is that specific
>>>>>> algorithms, in their own localized context, practically only require
>>>>>> destructibility and assignability. And even then,
>>>
>>> I was disavowing this part because I don't claim to know it for sure:
>>
>> Anyway, I'm not sure my exposition of that was very clear either.
>> That's why I'd like Dave to explain it in more detail (ignore what I
>> said you said), instead of me trying to interpret it.
>
> The colon is meant to indicate that the statement applies to what
> follows, not what comes before.

Ofcourse. Missed it :-P
Thanks!

--
Paul Smith