Re: [boost] Building 1.52.0 with g++ 4.7.2

Subject: Re: [boost] Building 1.52.0 with g++ 4.7.2
From: Richard Hadsell (hadsell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-01 17:38:48

On 02/01/2013 05:09 PM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> boost.build was not able to deduce on which architecture it is running. I
> assume it's x86 - then the question is why x86.cpp does not compile.
> the file contains only compiler macros declared for x86, like:
> #if !defined(i386)&&  !defined(__i386__)&&  !defined(__i386) \
>      &&  !defined(__i486__)&&  !defined(__i586__)&&  !defined(__i686__) \
>      &&  !defined(_M_IX86)&&  !defined(__X86__)&&  !defined(_X86_) \
>      &&  !defined(__THW_INTEL__)&&  !defined(__I86__)&&  !defined(__INTEL__) \
>      &&  !defined(__amd64__)&&  !defined(__x86_64__)&&  !defined(__amd64) \
>      &&  !defined(__x86_64)&&  !defined(_M_X64)
> #error "Not x86"
> #endif
> maybe I should remove instruction-set=core2 first
>
Thanks.  That was enough to tell me that the predefined macros were not getting through.  When attempting to debug them with '-dM -E' options, I found that we were missing some runtime libraries.  I believe that will fix the problem with our compiler.

-- 
Dick Hadsell			203-992-6320  Fax: [phone]
Reply-to:			hadsell_at_[hidden]
Blue Sky Studioshttp://www.blueskystudios.com
1 American Lane, Greenwich, CT 06831-2560
Follow Blue Sky Studios on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/BlueSkyStudios> and Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/blueskystudios>