Subject: Re: [boost] boost::optional -- updates for C++11 move semantics
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-05 10:44:55
On 05/02/13 15:26, Diggory Hardy wrote:
> Dear list,
> I wanted something like boost::optional, but with support for move-
> construction/assignment, so I went ahead and had a go at patching it.
> Attached is based on boost 1.49 (Ubuntu package). Could someone please review?
> I've not contributed to boost before. The changes at least aren't too
> complicated, but:
> 1) I'm not entirely sure if the move constructor (line 636) and swap function
> (line 1046) are implemented in the best way (also see line 279),
> 2) and I have no idea how is_[not_]reference_tag (line 486) works.
> 3) There should maybe also be a unit test.
> Of course, I am happy for my contributions to be published under the boost
I recommend that you give your changes as a diff rather than give the
new version of the files.