Subject: Re: [boost] Tests failing?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-08 02:49:49
John Maddock <boost.regex <at> virgin.net> writes:
> Not only that but there are many unmaintained libraries with the same issue
> (a quick grep would confirm this), not only would each have to be switched
> over, but you would also have to verify nothing has been broken in each
> case, and manage the merging of all those libraries to release as well.
> Preferably without upsetting anyone
I think I still prefer these to be cleaned up.
> Frankly it's way easier to provide a backwards compatible-layer for the
There is one, but it is not being actively tested, so some issues may creep up.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk